From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: jit-lock-antiblink-grace Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 22:16:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83wobhm85n.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k198ly94.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgnuh5cq.fsf@gnu.org> <87k17qozii.fsf@gmail.com> <83wobps0zy.fsf@gnu.org> <20191125184650.GA4496@ACM> <20191125192628.GC4496@ACM> <20191125201115.GD4496@ACM> <83d0deseo7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r21ptc02.fsf@gmail.com> <83y2vxmao3.fsf@gnu.org> <87mucdt96k.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="171674"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: acm@muc.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 30 21:17:44 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ib9BX-000iUW-CC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 21:17:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38008 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ib9BV-0000hW-Hg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 15:17:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ib9B0-0000fJ-LO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 15:17:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ib9B0-0000P8-18; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 15:17:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2895 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ib9Az-0000ig-Gp; Sat, 30 Nov 2019 15:17:09 -0500 In-reply-to: <87mucdt96k.fsf@gmail.com> (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28g?= =?utf-8?B?VMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Sat, 30 Nov 2019 20:12:51 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242923 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org, acm@muc.de > Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 20:12:51 +0000 > > >> b. You go to line 7 and type a quote > >> c. You go to line 3 and type a quote > >> > >> Previously, after step b) you would get lines 8, 9, and 10 (and 7 > >> partially) string-fontified "immediately". > >> > >> Now, after step b), and _if stay on the same line_, it takes 2 seconds > >> for lines 7-10 to be string-fontified. If you leave line 7 in your > >> journey to line 3 before those 2 seconds are up, 7-10 are immediately > >> string-fontified (and the old and new version become identical in > >> behaviour). > > > > So how is this a problem, if at worst we get the old behavior? > > After b), you now have to wait 2 seconds (jit-lock-antiblink-grace) > before you get the old behaviour (string-fontifying 7-10). Isn't this the new behavior?