From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Current mode command discovery Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 20:28:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83wnv1w9zq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v9aubm96.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1laomak.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgzxlgvo.fsf@gnus.org> <83im6lxwnt.fsf@gnu.org> <87blcdjuce.fsf@gnus.org> <83eeh9xsim.fsf@gnu.org> <87czwtiadm.fsf@gnus.org> <835z2lxptd.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgzxgu3g.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27860"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 21 19:29:47 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDtUJ-0007Ay-P3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:29:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41890 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDtUI-0003r8-RC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:29:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDtTk-0003Hn-E4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:29:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDtTk-000898-4h; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:29:12 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3483 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lDtTh-0001tZ-Iu; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:29:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zgzxgu3g.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:21:23 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265424 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:21:23 +0100 > > Yes, I'm really unsure about `digit-argument' (and > `negative-argument'). On the one hand, you can't `M-x' them in any > meaningful way? (Or can you? I'm not even sure about that.) On the > other hand, they are commands that people will see popping up in many > contexts, so keeping them in `M-x' completion might make sense from that > point of view? Invoking them via M-x may not make a lot of sense, but asking for help on them definitely does. So I think we need to have a way of removing them from some completions, but not from others.