From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: native-comp *Warnings* buffer Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 08:30:46 +0300 Message-ID: <83wnrzutx5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k0o2z9pr.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83y2chzvxw.fsf@gnu.org> <87czttxquo.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21601"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 16 07:32:49 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1li9OT-0005RX-Dv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 07:32:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57982 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1li9OS-0008UI-Dx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 01:32:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1li9Mh-0007lD-3N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 01:31:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41166) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1li9Mf-0005Fd-UA; Sun, 16 May 2021 01:30:58 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3070 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1li9MT-0001uF-DG; Sun, 16 May 2021 01:30:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sun, 16 May 2021 01:12:49 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269328 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 16 May 2021 01:12:49 -0400 > > > > I think "stealth" compilation performed opportunistically in the > > > background should indeed not display any warnings (by default). > > I understand the reason for saying that, but... would this mean that a > > compilation of that material won't happen later? > > No, the compilation must have happened *before*, because native > compilation is only performed for files that are compiled to > `.elc`, AFAIK. > > > Is there a chance that you'll never see the warnings that > > compilation generates? > > AFAIK, no, because before native compilation takes place, the code will > already have been byte-compiled. I think it actually could happen if the relevant *.el files are modified during the session and then recompiled or reloaded.