From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "after" variable watchers Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 21:45:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83wnrxryft.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lf8du09t.fsf@gnu.org> <3431d752-559a-7d33-e2fb-2d81dd6cc794@gmx.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36208"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, npostavs@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 17 21:19:24 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1liilu-0009B8-Hg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 21:19:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38410 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liilt-0003qb-C4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 15:19:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liiFq-0003p5-3X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 14:46:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liiFp-0005Yr-DH; Mon, 17 May 2021 14:46:13 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1075 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liiFm-0000dz-Jc; Mon, 17 May 2021 14:46:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 17 May 2021 14:36:28 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269421 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , npostavs@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 14:36:28 -0400 > > > window_updeco_window is called indirectly from all places that change a > > window's decorations, font or size. > > Would it make sense to call it more lazily, e.g. as part of redisplay > (basically, the watchpoints would just set some dirty bits and then at > the beginning of redisplay you'd then run `window_updeco_window` on > those windows with the dirty bit set)? You don't need a watcher to set flags on windows. Each change in the dimensions of windows and their decorations is already preformed by functions.