From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: "C-x 5 5" vs "C-x 4 1" inconsistency
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:30:56 +0300
Message-ID: <83wnmmwnn3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83zgriwnv2.fsf@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="36727"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 09 11:32:57 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mZ8iv-0009Mr-PT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 11:32:57 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53522 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mZ8iu-0002Xh-Jn
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 05:32:56 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55102)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mZ8hG-0000qU-O7
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 05:31:16 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50540)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mZ8hF-0000dM-0C
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 05:31:14 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1255
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mZ8hC-0000vz-OK
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 05:31:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <83zgriwnv2.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 09
 Oct 2021 12:26:09 +0300)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276603
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/276603>

> Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:26:09 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> 
> I think this inconsistency is unfortunate and unjustified.  Can we
> please move same-window-prefix to "C-x 4 5" for consistency with the
> equivalent frame command?

Sorry, I meant "C-x 4 4" and other-window-prefix.