From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:48:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83wnl4v8dh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> <8735nszpdv.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfvswrp8.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgq0tu7z.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5978"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 19 09:49:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mnzaQ-0001Kw-TR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:49:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45102 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnzaP-0000KS-G7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 03:49:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnzZT-00084d-6M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 03:48:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=55262 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnzZS-00083a-TU; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 03:48:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=wev8su2U7LOz+xfmSE+sq1rDjxRfJC0qf8X5WwCQHcI=; b=KEqRsRAF9cpc HaYFB5ut0RCxLELaEzMmdqpjUumU49WRYNhC65zVoEB1BekAYvfTFIltPKC0FahqmqYQOc34LQ0z1 Werp8+IIFegaMUasdML/oJQfPPnW8iDiCREk2akiHCLD0/wCcx/BS88C2CnGIrGXq5K/K8hBdFRqM Sg67PebMS2PsMk2IK+uV/Gk31PiYav2VwIYZ+5vO402WOqmVPwxLQSTf5XEA753K0w+Nb5E1qHEOK SMXWnLoCbFRqMMEfV3ZPHxQLoilitC9b4Db2Up2RKD3n1qYY14nXDSNdMRuPy7Hsy3lGkLTmb3UPt BwLjxolWCbWBqja6gxpMnw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3408 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnzZL-0003HS-QS; Fri, 19 Nov 2021 03:48:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zgq0tu7z.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:39:28 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279739 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 09:39:28 +0100 > Cc: Emacs developers , Dmitry Gutov > > Stefan Kangas writes: > > > To my eyes, it looks really good. A marked improvement. > > Looks good to me too, but this reminded me of one thing: Emacs (by > default) chooses a variable-pitch font that is markedly smaller than the > monospaced font, in my experience, and you can see the same in your > screenshot. Here the font of variable-pitch face is actually larger by a pixel or two, but this is MS-Windows. > I think we should look into that It probably has something to do with how we choose fonts, and also with which fonts are available.