From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Development Speed Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 09:03:05 +0200 Message-ID: <83wnjtqi8m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r1a4yfpt.fsf@gnu.org> <8335mky4rl.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10905"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 25 08:04:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n116u-0002al-9y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 08:04:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37290 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n116s-0007eQ-Ly for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 02:04:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1152-0006bd-Gf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 02:03:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=39068 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1152-0007ZY-6T; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 02:03:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=FJqn9vtbs6fxX8WYzwUjcP8nhlhqHSeQjvrCH/zZ3fc=; b=PJbikPj8xS3Q mpYC2wUbb0DUmLDLvuFH8ulomLQfz0Y5gttrSd6TGTED4tbXBk2ZxzFAQPcDjk/7pbCdZ4CklrAtx wrkQ75BzZGrhP6I1JdQYLMbAZ1axnsexhIZnOYe3ge3wB5+iurgXbOTs/UQ8ORdv1JPN0c8EniTxA oLufN41L+C902H1cniIJLLZuFRXcUGUJ96jG20quSzOAjPMu0YOXSPIkneCXjPck8fE0SpMWk6V+L WQlXJXLrMQsRSs5ZteI+14kOEh8T3qz0PMwZRHz6mfAQt6L7xT2HHfsu99VqTUj+glZaG7xU8nzcz 3qb8SAIk8fFe1sgfKzT9kw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1307 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n114w-0007c0-TK; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 02:02:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Richard Stallman on Sat, 25 Dec 2021 00:16:03 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283186 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: xenodasein@tutanota.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 00:16:03 -0500 > > Why are inlinable functions superior to macros in regard to ease of > understanding the code? I don't see how they help. They make debugging slightly easier, because you can set a breakpoint inside them and more easily step through the code. In an unoptimized build, they also appear in the backtrace, which also helps a little.