From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Alternative build systems (Was: Abysmal state of GTK build) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:14:21 +0300 Message-ID: <83wnaz6ioy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wnb1bt96.fsf@gnu.org> <87a67vuwmo.fsf@gnus.org> <41a702f1-60fb-65fb-3862-d198c46cd6e6@gmail.com> <87sflnqaub.fsf@gnus.org> <87a67vhtat.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13798"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 23 18:21:47 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oQWew-0003LP-Ta for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:21:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47392 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQWev-0004Af-Iv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:21:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQWXf-00064N-KA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:14:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQWXe-0007yN-Q0; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:14:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=dUCaUkZAxxEidlyhqkNixyIAqn1MbQdIX5h+I+zBr/0=; b=k1amWn9d202nNwLjnVGj sChjh+u9fxAImpcXMo0K23BGdR6l02ii4syuRXIgvIdAltdsRVqWaWi38IiFQYfkyW91v6Vx3SSsP 89KttCRbBi6mMACF3AVkOQjFRgFPDXjMX81hNRn1H0U4xrqrx8ruFxV3OGdASw99/uX/YYiVNUWlF NBl8XDCHbdqcFw5nqUkvnGuYtN/Hcvvo1oEr+O/+4JBG5ArzumaInRfMnf4gKl/0kbm+aICHCZ/3r 8BzqJVMxP0QvYp7KSCq+FCfGRKHfi1QWGDdLuu88GxRaIo1X3dPhfkDXpH4JYMa6iCITKigpxQox6 zXxbxev28mmLlw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1708 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQWXe-0002oz-8x; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:14:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a67vhtat.fsf@telefonica.net> (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes on Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:29:46 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293901 Archived-At: > From: Óscar Fuentes > Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:29:46 +0200 > > Apart from better performance, CMake would simplify the scripts a great > deal. Not IME, not with the many complications and different configurations we support. E.g., does Gnulib support CMake builds?