From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Difficulties byte-compiling very large .el file Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:30:05 +0300 Message-ID: <83vdkigwya.fsf@gnu.org> References: <794057160908191449t4b23080cjf2b85cb0f8e4f589@mail.gmail.com> <794057160908200607h50353f90o3bd175f1fca84e47@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1250793713 12583 80.91.229.12 (20 Aug 2009 18:41:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:41:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: aemoncannon@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 20 20:41:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MeCZt-0005e7-JQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:41:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33131 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MeCZt-000792-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MeCQi-0008Gv-5J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:32:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MeCQg-0008Df-Sk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:32:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34558 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MeCQg-0008CP-9q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il ([84.95.2.1]:19533) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MeCQf-0006UY-ST for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout1.012.net.il by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KOO00400U101R00@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:32:04 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.180.85]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KOO0078EU5F1V80@i-mtaout1.012.net.il>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:32:04 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <794057160908200607h50353f90o3bd175f1fca84e47@mail.gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114453 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:01 -0400 > From: Aemon Cannon > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Bingo! > ../test/grammars/as3_elispParser.el:31515:33:Error: Bytecode overflow > > I'm not super familiar with emacs byte-compiling, but my guess is that > increasing > the size of the operands is not an option. Should I look for a > conditional that spans > a lot of code, and try to fix it that way? > > Thoughts? Submit a bug report ("M-x report-emacs-bug RET") and someone will take care of it.