From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Version 6.1 of the Unicode Standard is released Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:08:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83vcnqpgsm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y5smpizu.fsf@gnu.org> <4F297B16.8030900@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328119864 19429 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2012 18:11:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 19:11:03 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsee7-0001sV-Dr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:11:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsee6-0006qE-TK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35273) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsee3-0006pn-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:11:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsee2-0002nx-A1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:10:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:40155) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsee1-0002ns-U4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:10:58 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LYQ00L007LF9K00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:10:54 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.51.244]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LYQ00JF87U63UQ0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:10:54 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4F297B16.8030900@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148098 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:49:10 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 02/01/2012 09:21 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > See http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.1.0/. > > > > Should we update our files in admin/unidata, or is there some danger > > and we should wait until after 24.1? > > Do you see any real harm in updating? Not something specific, no. I just saw that there are quite a few changes in character properties (UnicodeData.txt), which could potentially affect something. But this is not based on any facts.