From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 24.3 windows binaries are available Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 10:43:36 +0200 Message-ID: <83vc8r3fbb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <84k3pcskym.fsf@siart.de> <8438vv7rv2.fsf@siart.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1363423424 18113 80.91.229.3 (16 Mar 2013 08:43:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 08:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uwe Siart Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 16 09:44:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UGmij-0001bb-Ty for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 09:44:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51052 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGmiN-0000uh-2i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 04:43:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35627) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGmiJ-0000u2-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 04:43:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGmiI-0000b5-OX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 04:43:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:59292) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGmiI-0000au-GB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 04:43:38 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MJQ00100VFYG200@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 10:43:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MJQ0015VW8MGI40@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 10:43:35 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <8438vv7rv2.fsf@siart.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157898 Archived-At: > From: Uwe Siart > Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 07:58:57 +0100 > > Uwe Siart writes: > > > I will use this package now for productive work. Should some other issue > > pop up I'll post it here. > > There are no more problems that I can realize until now (at least within > my usecases). IMO this package could become the official windows binary > distribution. It would be better if libxml2 support were included in a distribution we consider official and recommend for download. I also don't understand why GnuTLS 3.0.9 and libxml2 2.7.8 from the site advertised in nt/INSTALL caused any trouble. These 2 work for me, and AFAIK for others. If there are some problems with those binary distributions, we should fix them, because we cannot advertise incompatible packages. OTOH, if there's something wrong in Miguel's build procedures that causes incompatibility, those procedures should be fixed. Miguel, could you please report what was wrong with your original build, and why you switched to a different binary of GnuTLS?