From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage. Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:08:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83vc46zwsy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83oba22ymd.fsf@gnu.org> <6B4F86F0-164D-4CBE-8CD2-9BC9326451C4@swipnet.se> <8361w93k8e.fsf@gnu.org> <871u6x4we0.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <58D8CF7D-C157-4D48-93B4-2EFFAA4AAF61@swipnet.se> <8338rd2q1h.fsf@gnu.org> <534E99D7-CC13-4C8D-A80B-EC00995F741A@swipnet.se> <83txjt15hw.fsf@gnu.org> <83li550z3l.fsf@gnu.org> <87ip072t8d.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374228554 32578 80.91.229.3 (19 Jul 2013 10:09:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 19 12:09:14 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V07cc-0003p1-Dt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 12:09:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43806 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V07cb-0008Il-V2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 06:09:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47383) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V07cY-0008IR-BV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 06:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V07cX-00070d-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 06:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:52614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V07cW-00070X-Uy; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 06:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MQ600I00HA67600@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:08:35 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MQ600HTAHIAMQC0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:08:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162014 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , > Jan Dj=E4rv > , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 05:32:14 -0400 >=20 > > If jit-lock timers are firing too often, that could certainly be = fixed > > too, as there's nothing inherent about that which requires freque= ntly > > firing timers when idle (or even when active, if all jit-locking = has > > been completed and jit-lock'd buffers haven't changed)... >=20 > Jit lock doesn't run any timers by default Yes, and neither does "emacs -Q". Like I said: we've just made=20 "emacs -Q" battery-friendly. > AFAIK, and I expect that fairly few users use the features that > require timers (jit-lock-stealth and jit-lock-defer). I expect most of them do use timer-dependent features all the time.