From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (Q|V)xxx mess? Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:31:10 +0300 Message-ID: <83vc1fd48h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <524C3F20.6020602@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380731484 13637 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2013 16:31:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 16:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 02 18:31:27 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VRPKh-0006wm-AH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 18:31:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36958 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRPKg-0003jN-V1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 12:31:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48791) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRPKY-0003i7-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 12:31:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRPKS-0007Ae-7M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 12:31:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:41506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VRPKR-0007AY-VK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 12:31:12 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MU100F00V5JKN00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:31:11 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MU100FGZV7YKW00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:31:11 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <524C3F20.6020602@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163811 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:43:28 +0400 > From: Dmitry Antipov > > There are few pairs of (Q|V)xxx variables where Qxxx looks like > a leftovers in favor of Vxxx counterparts. For example, (Q|V)inhibit_quit > and (Q|V)inhibit_point_motion_hooks - I don't see any real use of > Qxxx except DEFSYM and (dummy?) specbind for both. Are Qxxx really > leftovers which can be removed? Aren't Vxxx the variables while Qxxx their symbols?