From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:26:04 +0200 Message-ID: <83vbhqpas3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150324163714.GA27775@thyrsus.com> <83y4mmpb1n.fsf@gnu.org> <55119DC0.40007@dancol.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427218000 3966 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2015 17:26:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 24 18:26:31 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YaSat-0000xA-Bx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:26:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33668 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaSas-0004h0-Gp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:26:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaSap-0004gu-Ng for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:26:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaSal-000415-N9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:40384) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YaSal-00040m-Fc; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:26:15 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLQ00E008AMV700@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:26:14 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLQ00EED8FPT070@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:26:14 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <55119DC0.40007@dancol.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184167 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:24:16 -0700 > From: Daniel Colascione > CC: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> Yes. It would mean VC mode could not be used to work on private development > >> branches. > > > > Why cannot VC determine whether a branch is private or not? > > It's a matter of convention, not something vc can query. Whether I want > to push depends on a lot more than what vc, or any automated tool, can > figure out in the general case by sniffing around the build environment. You are answering a different question. I asked why it's hard to determine that a branch is a private one, not to determine my intent to push or not.