From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature freezes and Emacs 25 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:12:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83vb91c493.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5625B166.3080104@dancol.org> <86zizdczhp.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <871tc315y3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k2pvqg0l.fsf@gnu.org> <837fluqkd1.fsf@gnu.org> <87oaf1s82r.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r3jwdp3p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h9krj27a.fsf@gmail.com> <83h9kri0m3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447714019 8596 80.91.229.3 (16 Nov 2015 22:46:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Xue Fuqiao Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 16 23:46:50 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZySXy-0002ij-Bi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:46:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51583 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZySXx-0003jg-S0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:46:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyMOj-0003jT-3O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:12:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyMOd-0005WB-Vx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:12:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:40548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyMOd-0005Vn-P9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:12:47 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXX0050010V9D00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:12:46 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXX004R9118YH90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:12:46 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194581 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:51:40 +0800 > From: Xue Fuqiao > > I've changed RELEASE-PROCESS to lower-case and removed the feature > freeze section of my patches. I'll push it to `master' later. Thanks, but why to 'master'? Doesn't the document describe the process we want to use during the release of Emacs 25.1? If so, then its place is on the emacs-25 branch, and since this is documentation that cannot possibly break anything, there are no dilemmas regarding its effect on stability. I thought I wrote a day or two ago that documentation changes should go to emacs-25, not to master. (Actually, the default branch for pushing any work should now be emacs-25, except for new features.) TIA