From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 05:38:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83vaxj9yhc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877fa12iyq.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83h995ay04.fsf@gnu.org> <87y42h13pi.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83fuopax4g.fsf@gnu.org> <87twd512pk.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <831t07bxlj.fsf@gnu.org> <8737kn37qe.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474857538 2996 195.159.176.226 (26 Sep 2016 02:38:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 02:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, tino.calancha@gmail.com To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 26 04:38:54 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1boLoa-0007av-B3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 04:38:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41266 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boLoY-0005mq-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:38:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44213) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boLo3-0005ml-4B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boLnz-0006QL-S8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:38:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1boLnz-0006QD-Oq; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3847 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1boLnx-0007Ts-SJ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:38:06 -0400 In-reply-to: <8737kn37qe.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (message from Andreas Schwab on Mon, 26 Sep 2016 01:00:41 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207807 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 01:00:41 +0200 > Cc: tino.calancha@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On Sep 25 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I don't think we should knowingly remove existing features without a > > very good reason. > > There is a very good reason: it does not work I've shown that it did work, albeit in a cumbersome and kludgey manner. > and was never intented to work. You'd need to present more convincing arguments than that to change my mind.