From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GitLab CI setup file in scratch/tzz/gitlab Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 09:49:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83vappm3fz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87shkvnh2z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83inlrngte.fsf@gnu.org> <864lxal9zf.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <83efwend39.fsf@gnu.org> <86h919kapj.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <83y3ulmvk1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1493362235 32006 195.159.176.226 (28 Apr 2017 06:50:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 06:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lars@nocrew.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 28 08:50:31 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d3zjb-0008E6-1q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 08:50:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35442 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3zjg-0007N5-PC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:50:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3zja-0007N0-LA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:50:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3zjW-0007Sq-Ny for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:50:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3zjW-0007SY-Jl; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:50:26 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2477 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1d3zjV-0003fa-QK; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:50:26 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:20:23 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214374 Archived-At: > Cc: lars@nocrew.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 02:20:23 +0300 > > On 27.04.2017 23:42, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Nothing prevents us from deciding that we want to support several CI > > servers, not just one. > > Then my point is that this kind of decision should be like "yeah, ok, > this looks useful", instead of taking days or even weeks of deliberation. AFAIU, it's not the decision that takes days or weeks, it's the actual work on using the server and collecting the experience which would allow the decision to be made.