From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About curly quotes (again) [Was: Emacs 26.1 release branch created] Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 11:31:42 +0300 Message-ID: <83vak04mfl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83377mls4d.fsf@gnu.org> <20170919173511.GA19168@ACM> <83bmm6h8vr.fsf@gnu.org> <20170919180944.GB19168@ACM> <838thah71i.fsf@gnu.org> <20170919194356.GC19168@ACM> <20170919210925.GF19168@ACM> <87y3paypfz.fsf@jane> <87efqxvf26.fsf@jane> <83377dboij.fsf@gnu.org> <87a81luru4.fsf@jane> <83ing8ak4v.fsf@gnu.org> <8760c6vqtz.fsf@jane> <87wp4ltz0a.fsf@jane> <83d1698zke.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9psaa8x.fsf@jane> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506760357 489 195.159.176.226 (30 Sep 2017 08:32:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 08:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, jwiegley@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, acm@muc.de To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 30 10:32:32 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyDCI-0007vY-LI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:32:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38561 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyDCP-0007Js-OO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:32:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyDCF-0007Jm-6q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:32:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyDCE-0006dW-DI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:32:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyDBd-0006TV-9H; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:31:49 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1860 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dyDBc-0006Wa-Na; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 04:31:49 -0400 In-reply-to: <87o9psaa8x.fsf@jane> (message from Marcin Borkowski on Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:58:22 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218962 Archived-At: > From: Marcin Borkowski > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, jwiegley@gmail.com, kaushal.modi@gmail.com, acm@muc.de > Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:58:22 +0200 > > >> In theory, yes. But: `C-x '. > > > > Not sure what is your problem with this" "i C-x DEL RET" finds that > > binding nicely. > > Funny: i C-x DEL RET works, but i C-x not. "C-x " should NOT work. Key bindings are indexed without the <..> markup. > (OTOH, i C-x works again.) How do you mean "works"? Where in the manual does it land you? > >> (Although this is obviously a bug/omission.) > > > > Is it? > > So probably yes, at least an inconsistency (a minor one, I admit). There was a small number of incorrect index entries for key bindings, I fixed them now. > >> And the section on interactive codes is really long, and I search > >> for it often enough that the curly quotes do annoy me. > > > > Again, not sure what's the problem. here's what I'd do: > > > > "i interactive code RET" followed by "C-s ^" (for example) > > How about C-s P? ;-) Why would I do something like that? Anyway, I think we can close this discussion now.