From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-26.0.91: switch-to-buffer-other-window runs too slowly (about 0.1s) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 21:58:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83vadiek9y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83efk6g93z.fsf@gnu.org> <544b8346-bda9-45eb-9573-1d51d9f768b2@Spark> <83bmfag8gu.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3ie24z1.fsf@gmail.com> <87sh8m23tc.fsf@gmail.com> <87k1ty22p1.fsf@gmail.com> <837epyg30w.fsf@gnu.org> <83370mg0qj.fsf@gnu.org> <5AB94021.8080700@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522090594 2544 195.159.176.226 (26 Mar 2018 18:56:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 18:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 26 20:56:30 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f0XIB-0000TO-0o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:56:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58573 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0XKE-0006Zj-2a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54105) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0XK7-0006Yo-PW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:58:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0XK3-0001G9-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:58:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52459) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0XK3-0001G3-2Z; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:58:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3752 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f0XK2-0000I8-GL; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:58:22 -0400 In-reply-to: <5AB94021.8080700@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:46:57 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224068 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:46:57 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > And my GTK Emacs notoriously lies about the visibility of frames > anyway. You mean, FRAME_VISIBLE_P is not reliable in your GTK Emacs?