From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build: viper-ex
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:46:04 +0300
Message-ID: <83v9x9zm9f.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3r28xrfl9.fsf@gnus.org>
 <CAM-tV-_=RrOFobrdnzdYBWVZ8v2DSQJzpi2Mbsa2E3gL3kDBNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <m3ef4iq0pd.fsf@gnus.org>
 <CAM-tV--Rvb0RFRfpP4u348U0-EAcN-NLVfEzTRkE9Rc7RAacWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <m38suqq03h.fsf@gnus.org> <83zhn6zkgf.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m3lfyqobq7.fsf@gnus.org>
 <CAM-tV--MF1oCYQ+BFX=PW27ZMYEPzxajkGb0oo7msVidHD-Ceg@mail.gmail.com>
 <m3d0k1o6gl.fsf@gnus.org> <jwvimtttg8t.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <m3ftoi3m5o.fsf@gnus.org> <m3blz63j41.fsf@gnus.org>
 <CAM-tV-85nAR_vHoXhmZfuu1ndfK-6FVopzKMbwtfDmm7gkU7Kw@mail.gmail.com>
 <m336ki3ghd.fsf@gnus.org> <jwvimteipi7.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <m3v9xezi75.fsf@gnus.org> <m3r282zfjx.fsf@gnus.org>
 <83a7eo9nsh.fsf@gnu.org> <m3k1dqzyul.fsf@gnus.org>
 <m3a7emmltr.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <8336ke884v.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m3v9x9k853.fsf@gnus.org>
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="51829"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 13 15:39:11 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hbPwZ-000DEI-32
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:39:07 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39766 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hbPwX-0001Pz-5C
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:39:05 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40448)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1hbP7Q-0002nZ-Ki
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:46:18 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59801)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1hbP7F-0004Pd-TH; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:46:09 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2322 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1hbP7C-0000kU-U8; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 08:46:03 -0400
In-reply-to: <m3v9x9k853.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 
 13 Jun 2019 14:00:08 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237502
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/237502>

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:00:08 +0200
> 
> >> 	  (if (string= tag "")
> >> 	      (find-tag ex-tag t)
> >> 	    (find-tag-other-window ex-tag))
> >
> > Time to use the new anti-warning facilities you just introduced?
> 
> But presumably this is a real warning about a function that will go away
> (and the viper-ex function won't), so it should be fixed by rewriting
> this in terms of the xref-* functions.

I don't think find-tag is going anywhere any time soon.