From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VOTE: Changing completions-common-part face's default Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 17:52:14 +0200 Message-ID: <83v9rt82tt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pni7p83l.fsf@gmail.com> <87h83ipoi0.fsf@gmail.com> <93235eb5-8e04-7182-e2a4-49fbe610ee2b@yandex.ru> <28d4ae09-daca-324b-2fa6-9d7138d710fa@yandex.ru> <834kzeb1cc.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgmxa6dh.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="79305"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 09 16:52:52 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTT2h-000KW8-Fe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 16:52:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37340 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTT2g-0001ZW-3F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 10:52:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTT2F-0001ZQ-Lh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 10:52:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTT2F-0004XQ-9m; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 10:52:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4264 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iTT2E-0007jA-IJ; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 10:52:22 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sat, 09 Nov 2019 10:25:52 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242045 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 10:25:52 -0500 > > > I'd actually expect this face to use the background, because that's > > how other applications behave, and I thought this change was motivated > > by that? > > While highlighting the "common-part" is definitely standard, there's > definitely not a standard *way* to highlight it. While a background > color is used in some cases I have the vague impression that it might be > a minority rather than a majority of cases. Don't "the other" applications use bold instead of color? > >> we'd also want to find a color for the dark background case, > > Right. > > But I'd also rather postpone this decision to later. Not sure why: a lot of people use dark background in Emacs, AFAIK.