From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs) Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 14:00:06 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9mgx2a1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83369o1khx.fsf@gnu.org> <83imijz68s.fsf@gnu.org> <831rp7ypam.fsf@gnu.org> <86wo6yhj4d.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83o8sax803.fsf@gnu.org> <86pncpffmk.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="128708"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 03 13:02:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jKK5T-000XJ8-D4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 13:02:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53654 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKK5S-0006DT-DO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:02:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41439) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKK3k-0004qH-Bq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:00:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKK3j-0002sO-Sv; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:00:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1906 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jKK3f-0000aA-WB; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 07:00:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Robert Pluim on Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:11:07 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246312 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:11:07 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel > > Stephen> I don't understand what the alternative is. The parser imposes the > Stephen> reasonable requirement that the input text be utf-8 (or possibly some > Stephen> other standard format). Emacs raw buffer text is not utf-8, so we must > Stephen> do some encoding. > > Itʼs pretty close, apart from raw bytes. Not only raw bytes: also some characters that cannot be unified with Unicode.