From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 21:16:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9mdssqx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834ku43c61.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200404104553.GA5329@ACM> <07fe3b69-3ab2-3173-0696-cb17809e2b91@gmx.at> <83blo7v68b.fsf@gnu.org> <1845d7aa-9ae4-3d95-6a30-c7b1d8d8adec@gmx.at> <83a73qt6zs.fsf@gnu.org> <97c4254e-ff43-8402-3645-f713c408c245@gmx.at> <83y2r9syby.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="15416"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, rrandresf@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, acm@muc.de To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 05 20:17:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jL9pb-0003su-Dy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 20:17:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50662 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jL9pa-0003ZP-Hf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 14:17:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jL9p3-00038w-8y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 14:16:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41043) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jL9p2-0005nG-05; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 14:16:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1626 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jL9ou-0008JB-No; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 14:16:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sun, 5 Apr 2020 21:05:00 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246471 Archived-At: > Cc: acm@muc.de, rrandresf@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2020 21:05:00 +0300 > > Do you guys want to try (setq jit-lock-defer-time 0)? It comes with a > certain visual downside, though. > > Or, alternatively, (setq fast-but-imprecise-scrolling t). This var seems > like a good idea in general, so we might consider going further with it. No, I want fontification to work fast enough to not require these measures. They are retreat of a kind: we are giving up correctness because we are annoyed by slowness.