From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Opaque objects and Emacs documentation Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 08:45:41 +0300 Message-ID: <83v9idea9m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200712184908.13140.5739@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200712184909.BBC61209B1@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <7bf4d6ef-c0ec-43dc-ad5d-f6e81422ad90@yandex.ru> <83zh84m5ws.fsf@gnu.org> <3dd1c224-69b2-40af-5b2e-43a310253632@yandex.ru> <83tuybmtxs.fsf@gnu.org> <859f594b-1343-6d26-e1ac-7157c44eb56c@yandex.ru> <83a6zyk4tt.fsf@gnu.org> <865zadhl1f.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35121"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 24 07:46:41 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jyqXZ-00093q-I5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 07:46:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43296 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyqXY-0006j1-JI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyqWs-0006J1-ME for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:45:58 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:32836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyqWs-00020h-Ak; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:45:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1169 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jyqWr-0005CI-PK; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 01:45:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 24 Jul 2020 03:43:41 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253179 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 03:43:41 +0300 > > Doesn't the Commentary cover most (all?) of the above? Documenting stuff in the commentary is better than nothing, but it is sub-optimal: our Help commands don't scan comments, so the information that is only in comments is less discoverable, certainly by users. Therefore, I think any information important to users should be in doc strings and the manual, not just in comments.