From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: san_ignore_object not found at link time
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 19:08:48 +0300
Message-ID: <83v9i1av3j.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20200801141014.51E78C21C82@raman-glaptop.localdomain>
 <83wo2ictyz.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuxmctmo.fsf@gnu.org>
 <20200801153823.GA55369@breton.holly.idiocy.org>
 <CAArVCkQ2RbM565grHuK9kL1e=oxN2SX1kMUwNuV3QtHKv_wuJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <83k0yicl01.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAArVCkTD-mVrm0rN4yN7EzJo7tXhu3Gt8VJqZL2MbcyMupFpDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <83h7tmcj45.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAArVCkTCPcQ0Ok5HRD02_xc1Yc8KyyejFRbFYwGeVOr7kacHMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAArVCkS2WTJOfRBE6wwr9Qt8SYx4X_Yzm06=h7QaNmfGk-sSsQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <83eeoqcguj.fsf@gnu.org> <83d04acgmj.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAArVCkT3hPuHARUGdPW9iabhdn7Mn2xejoaUk-wpaBpF4bpn2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="3862"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: alan@idiocy.org, raman@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 02 18:09:36 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1k2GYJ-0000uF-U1
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 18:09:35 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49248 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1k2GYI-0006KW-VY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:09:34 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49828)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1k2GXq-0005sP-EJ
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:09:06 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52264)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1k2GXo-0002uA-Si; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:09:04 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4036 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1k2GXo-00068s-9H; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 12:09:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAArVCkT3hPuHARUGdPW9iabhdn7Mn2xejoaUk-wpaBpF4bpn2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from Philipp Stephani on Sat, 1 Aug 2020 21:40:02 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253404
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/253404>

> From: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 21:40:02 +0200
> Cc: Alan Third <alan@idiocy.org>, Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>, raman <raman@google.com>
> 
> Yeah, that's what I feared. I've now made the assertion conditional.

The assertion is gone, thanks.

> It might be cleaner to rewrite that function to explicitly check for
> all known tag types:

Something like that.  Anything, really, because when I see the likes
of

   #  define lisp_h_XLP(o) ((void *) (uintptr_t) (o))

and know that 'o' can be a 64-bit integer whereas pointers are 32-bit
wide, I get shivers.