From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers!
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:47:07 +0300
Message-ID: <83v9fczwyc.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20201013190255.GA8896@ACM> <838sca0w7k.fsf@gnu.org>
 <jwv7drt7ogx.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="20626"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 14 17:16:34 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kSiW2-0005Gs-FT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 17:16:34 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56158 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kSiW1-0004lX-E3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:16:33 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40762)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1kSi3O-0007D3-KM
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:46:59 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58844)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kSi3N-0007oq-2B; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:46:57 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3765 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kSi3L-0006IY-Ec; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 10:46:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <jwv7drt7ogx.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
 Monnier on Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:28:39 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257646
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/257646>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:28:39 -0400
> 
> >> Seeing as how a minibuffer often has a strong association with its frame
> >> (e.g., C-x C-f opens a buffer in the same frame it was invoked from),
> >> this shifting of minibuffers from one frame to another is confusing.
> > Is it?  It makes sure the minibuffer is on the selected frame, which
> > is natural in many/most use cases.
> 
> But it only makes sure after you used another minibuffer

Maybe that's the bug we should fix, then?  Not "play along" with it by
making the exceptions be the rule?