From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The Emacs master is much slower than the emacs-27 branch. Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:57:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83v9dgb60a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877dpyzg9d.fsf@rub.de> <87czzpsyqn.fsf@gmx.net> <83o8j9eqwx.fsf@gnu.org> <874kl1spe9.fsf@gmx.net> <83blf9em55.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh2tr82r.fsf@gmx.net> <87v9dhr7i5.fsf@gmx.net> <838sadefiw.fsf@gnu.org> <83360le421.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2idcn8q.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnxxcmjr.fsf@gnu.org> <83tut0d7e9.fsf@gnu.org> <8c5fe90c-72ca-a2c3-29d2-1849458bb85a@gmx.at> <87wnxwwbqz.fsf@telefonica.net> <93719f51-14d1-2084-ce04-221344043721@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9831"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 16:58:06 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1klZwj-0002Rm-Mv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 16:58:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51852 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klZwi-0003NS-OQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 10:58:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klZw9-0002xD-6e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 10:57:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47370) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klZw8-000290-FJ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 10:57:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3265 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1klZw3-00074u-OK; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 10:57:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: (emacs-devel@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:260377 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:39:51 +0000 > cc: Óscar Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Gregory Heytings via "Emacs development discussions." > > > Like (2), at least with GCC on 64-bit GNU/Linux. Apparently Eli does not > see this on MS-Windows. I'd be surprised if the OS had anything to do with that. If someone can afford compiling a 32-bit build --with-wide-int on GNU/Linux using GCC 9 or later, we could see for sure.