From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Migrating to sourcehut - what's missing? Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:53:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83v8zfve8r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871r26w27h.fsf@thornhill.no> <87lf0dq08j.fsf@thornhill.no> <87v8zh6azv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zgot648w.fsf@posteo.net> <878rwdpry1.fsf@thornhill.no> <87lf0dk52x.fsf@posteo.net> <8735mlpqes.fsf@thornhill.no> <87zgotoanj.fsf@thornhill.no> <87zgosg8de.fsf@gnus.org> <87tuez7lyg.fsf@gnus.org> <875yrfu2ge.fsf@thornhill.no> <83zgorvfzx.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5467"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, larsi@gnus.org, philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Theodor Thornhill Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 23 10:56:01 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n0KpM-00018p-4S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:56:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56666 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0KpL-0000Pm-3x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 04:55:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Kn1-0007R4-UZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 04:53:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=49736 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Kn1-00030f-C5; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 04:53:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=4E1/7jH0NfrBGANehrGXSqsbN6D/Giz4JZBw5lFQaJA=; b=mHkMKK8CUgEi RHmzxomgm5vhonYh8yuzLmngHQVY90xr78NybG1+GsEnJo/TpQdEMM790pEPCvITV0bu1cw1wJC+y AOdArhQqRhL1Tb2CJldjacFCT7FGa8eEDVxrAqgxYny3R2d0MJYmJiJLb/LgAKOy+g4WJKX92DAUO /l/CLWyScXlZqQQkG3Zu25BsMIOJO6lNzTQKOsH5YK/2wUodSZ1NHWryd66ugSaxbw2RUuKeP7H5W 88zjp1rkFkpwtMOz/hWiTd8lX+7URGdVRm5RENEQRnNYXMxFoky/qGd29PA/xYdsrFDEmwJL2j54b eHSitYCXkhYMlSQfEqz8/Q==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4197 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n0Kn1-0001rT-5M; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 04:53:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Theodor Thornhill on Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:22:47 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:282901 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 10:22:47 +0100 > From: Theodor Thornhill > CC: larsi@gnus.org, eric@ericabrahamsen.net, philipk@posteo.net, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >From my POV, the problem is not with how mailing lists are handled > >there, the problem is with how email communications are handled when > >those are involved in discussing patches and other issues. AFAIU, > >this is what Lars was flagging, not the way mailing lists are hosted > >there: we don't intend to move the Emacs mailing lists to sourcehut, > >we just want to move the bug tracker and its related functionalities, > >and that includes sending and receiving email. > > Yes, this would mean that emacs devs would have to adopt a markdown based approach, which I assume also is unwanted. We need to use Markdown in email messages? That sounds tough on us, isn't it? I thought sourcehut was handling email exchange as first-class citizen, which would mean that any format, including plain text, is handled in some reasonable fashion. > I'm just glad this thread yielded some results, undecisive or not Yes, thanks.