From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows-specific questions about Bazaar Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:11:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83tywakoba.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834ooamrou.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259727241 17143 80.91.229.12 (2 Dec 2009 04:14:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 04:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alexander Belchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 02 05:13:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NFgbB-0005kk-4M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:13:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37610 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFgbA-00055U-I9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:13:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFgb5-00055P-4d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:13:47 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFgb0-00054o-K2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:13:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50182 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFgb0-00054l-Dw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:13:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:56017) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFgb0-0003tH-03 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:13:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KU000100BM7DS00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:13:22 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.213.252]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KU00000XBQ7U730@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:13:20 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118108 Archived-At: > From: Alexander Belchenko > Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:16:52 +0200 >=20 > Stefan Monnier =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > >> . CVS was notorious for problems when the time zone switches fr= om > >> Standard Time to DST and back, even though modern Windows sys= tems > >> and NTFS store times and file time stamps in UTC. Typically, > >> unless you did something special, the first "cvs up" after th= e > >> switch would send the entire sandbox upstream. (I even wrote= a > >> program that moved all time stamps an hour forward or back to= avoid > >> that.) Does Bazaar cope correctly with this, assuming the > >> time-zone information is set correctly in the Registry? > >=20 > > AFAIK, bzr does not use time-stamps in a semantics-significant wa= y. > > So at most you may notice a slight performance hit when the time = changes > > because Bzr ends up scanning more files than strictly needed. > > But it won't change the data sent over the network, AFAIK. >=20 > That's correct. Thanks.