From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Selection changes in revno 100822 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:16:13 +0300 Message-ID: <83tymxtuzm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834oeyv3ww.fsf@gnu.org> <87mxsqyp98.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83zkwptyij.fsf@gnu.org> <87tymx38m2.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281777513 15062 80.91.229.12 (14 Aug 2010 09:18:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 09:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 14 11:18:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkCsn-0006T1-Ds for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:18:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58222 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OkCsm-0004cM-LV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 05:18:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38574 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OkCsd-0004Z6-2X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 05:18:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkCsb-0005fj-6k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 05:18:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:43711) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkCsb-0005fb-0Q; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 05:18:17 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L7400F00XSIZA00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:18:16 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.102.143]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L7400FZ6XUF6AE0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:18:16 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87tymx38m2.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128668 Archived-At: > From: Miles Bader > Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:24:05 +0900 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Perhaps we should solve this inconsistency the other way around: have > > shift-selected text be copied (under control of the same variable). > > But, then shift-selected text would be inconsistent with other methods of > selection Which "other methods" are those?