From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 19:35:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83txdjvedl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1388785952.11337.16.camel@Iris> <874n5k12ft.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <1388841220.11337.21.camel@Iris> <87bnzrzuzp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <1388846290.11337.24.camel@Iris> <877gafzset.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <1388849055.11337.26.camel@Iris> <87fvp3snak.fsf@engster.org> <1388855790.11337.29.camel@Iris> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388857003 13727 80.91.229.3 (4 Jan 2014 17:36:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 17:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dak@gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jordi =?utf-8?Q?Guti=C3=A9rrez?= Hermoso Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 04 18:36:50 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VzV9V-0004Bv-Te for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 18:36:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55260 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzV9V-0007OV-6p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 12:36:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58049) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzV9O-0007OJ-2A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 12:36:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzV9I-0002ue-NX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 12:36:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:61194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzV9D-0002tr-0L; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 12:36:31 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MYW00F0006AGY00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 19:36:07 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MYW00FXP0W7I820@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 19:36:07 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <1388855790.11337.29.camel@Iris> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167302 Archived-At: > From: Jordi Guti=C3=A9rrez Hermoso > Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 12:16:30 -0500 > Cc: David Kastrup , emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > [bzr is] obviously not fit for Emacs. If it were, we wouldn't be > having this discussion in the first place. Why we are having this discussion is explained here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-01/msg00005.html There's nothing farther from truth than saying that bzr is not fit fo= r Emacs. All of the core developers used bzr for years with no problems. If bzr were still actively developed and maintained, we would probably stick to it, because the effort invested in integratin= g it into our development processes is not easily tossed.