From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Switching from old git tree Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:55:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83tx20g550.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ioiiotwx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87egt5q46l.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83zjbsg7qz.fsf@gnu.org> <87d28oom90.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416045352 4816 80.91.229.3 (15 Nov 2014 09:55:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 09:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 15 10:55:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpa52-0005F9-Tw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:55:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39678 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpa52-0004Un-K7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:55:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpa4t-0004Ug-QX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:55:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpa4n-0000fh-SP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:55:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:36765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpa4h-0000f0-Aw; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:55:23 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF200M00QHVP000@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:50:38 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF200K87RCETV40@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 11:50:38 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87d28oom90.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177159 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:18:19 +0100 > > On the same file system, the normal git clone operation uses hard > links, and those are unproblematic regarding the given caveat. Of course they are unproblematic: hard links are the default if -s is _not_ used. I was talking only about the suggestion to use -s.