unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 05:53:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83twzjv5cf.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a91bhmwf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>

> From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
> Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:57:52 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 21:08:20 +0100
> >> 
> >> Emacs is developed with a distributed version control system so working
> >> on private changes is perfectly possible without affecting the common
> >> public repository.
> >> 
> >> Where a change requires involving multiple platform maintainers, it is
> >> easily possible to first propose/provide the change in a branch where
> >> the respective platform developers able to test or cater for a change
> >> can prepare such changes without affecting the usability of the master
> >> branch for other developers.
> >
> > That's certainly a possibility.  But it, too, assumes some minimal
> > level of cooperation between the platform maintainers.  At the very
> > least, the idea and perhaps also the details of the change should be
> > published.  It makes no sense to ask others to guess how to find which
> > places on their platforms need change from large diffs.
> 
> I disagree here since those others will know the way around their
> platform code better than someone catering for a different platform.

Once the information about what should be changed is given, yes.  And
that is all that was requested.

> I would not myself go pointing out which stuff should be changed in the
> Windows code in order to parallel some GNU/Linux specific code changes
> I submit.

No one requested that.

> But that does not mean that a contributor should refrain from describing
> what he had to do on _his_ platform (with a high-level description
> rather than one tied into the platform-specific code) to accommodate the
> changes, and what functionality will likely be affected similarly on
> other platforms.

Exactly, this is the only request.




  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-22  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-16  9:54 Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-17  3:39 ` Paul Eggert
2015-01-17  8:34   ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-18 18:09     ` Paul Eggert
2015-01-18 18:23       ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-18 19:25         ` Paul Eggert
2015-01-18 19:50           ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-18 20:34             ` Paul Eggert
2015-01-19 16:03               ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-19 18:00                 ` Paul Eggert
2015-01-19 18:32                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-19 22:14                     ` Paul Eggert
2015-01-20 16:32                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-20 21:28                         ` Paul Eggert
2015-01-21 15:48                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-21 17:32                             ` Paul Eggert
2015-01-21 17:55                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-21 19:39                                 ` Paul Eggert
2015-01-21 20:07                                   ` Dmitry Gutov
2015-01-21 20:38                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-21 20:08                                   ` David Kastrup
2015-01-21 20:49                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-21 20:57                                       ` David Kastrup
2015-01-22  3:53                                         ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2015-01-21 20:30                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-21 20:49                                     ` David Kastrup
2015-01-22  3:51                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-22 14:20                                         ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83twzjv5cf.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).