From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:33:59 +0300 Message-ID: <83twrba7xk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2a7b9134-af2a-462d-af6c-d02bad60bbe8@default> <834mjecdy7.fsf@gnu.org> <834mjcbydi.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbbs9qd1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1441291952 4555 80.91.229.3 (3 Sep 2015 14:52:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jean-Christophe Helary Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 03 16:52:23 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXVsE-0006hM-18 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:52:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48759 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXVsD-0006C2-Go for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:52:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXVaX-00028t-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXVaR-00073v-0Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:55709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXVaQ-00072w-PK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:33:58 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NU300E00UY55C00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:34:12 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NU300998V4ZAQ50@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:34:12 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.185 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189503 Archived-At: > From: Jean-Christophe Helary > Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:08:17 +0900 > > > On Sep 3, 2015, at 11:41, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > >> From: Jean-Christophe Helary > >> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 06:51:07 +0900 > >> > >> the default it to catch *exactly* what the user types. > > > > That goes against long-standing Emacs practice, and I envision strong > > objections. > > Even if the current behavior were to be emulated by appropriate variables? You mean, customization variables? We were talking about the _default_ behavior. It's that default that I think people will object to have changed towards case-sensitivity.