From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is it time to drop ChangeLogs? Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 20:04:26 +0300 Message-ID: <83twfyg2ud.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56BE7E37.3090708@cs.ucla.edu> <4hd1rw1ubr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83vb50wxhv.fsf@gnu.org> <87y49vz4cg.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <87twg2g86g.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83eg76n5h5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y45eeoor.fsf@lifelogs.com> <577D42BB.1020500@cs.ucla.edu> <87oa694rfw.fsf@russet.org.uk> <837fcxlbay.fsf@gnu.org> <87lh1d2wg5.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83eg75jk5h.fsf@gnu.org> <87lh1cb6p0.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468083926 10717 80.91.229.3 (9 Jul 2016 17:05:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2016 17:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 09 19:05:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvgz-0005Eq-CM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 19:05:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51863 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvgx-0003mG-8x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:05:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49316) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvgr-0003kt-4C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:05:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvgl-0001Xa-Uj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:05:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvgl-0001XO-RD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1961 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bLvg9-00051c-HC; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:04:34 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:54:48 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205476 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:54:48 -0400 > > Given a program that can determine which function or entity name > to associate with each line, it would not be hard to make a list of > which entities are changed in a given patch. > > Do we have such a program? I don't know that we do. GDB can do that.