From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: goto-char doesn't stick Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:53:01 +0300 Message-ID: <83tw3i39ki.fsf@gnu.org> References: <03485ABD-CF71-4FF8-B887-ED7607341EBD@gnu.org> <79e9bd82-8c75-4281-92e8-38719fde9beb@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1497452010 20373 195.159.176.226 (14 Jun 2017 14:53:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lokedhs@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 14 16:53:26 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dL9fh-00051n-TM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:53:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49459 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dL9fn-0001ZQ-9B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dL9ff-0001ZA-9a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:53:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dL9fe-000317-O5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:53:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dL9fX-0002vd-D5; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:53:15 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2087 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dL9fW-0002jE-17; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:53:15 -0400 In-reply-to: <79e9bd82-8c75-4281-92e8-38719fde9beb@default> (message from Drew Adams on Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:05:39 -0700 (PDT)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215623 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 07:05:39 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > > > It's a feature, new in Emacs 26. If you don't like it, turn off > > switch-to-buffer-preserve-window-point. > > Interesting. But why was the default behavior changed to this > new behavior possibility? Because the new default makes much more sense in interactive sessions, especially when you have the same buffer displayed in multiple windows.