From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Doc string and operation of color-distance Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 20:24:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83tw03lvs8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mv5xm84m.fsf@gnu.org> <20170914191226.GA30876@holos.localdomain> <83377om6n6.fsf@gnu.org> <20170915164543.GA19268@holos.localdomain> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505496315 25948 195.159.176.226 (15 Sep 2017 17:25:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:25:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Mark Oteiza Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 15 19:25:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsuMW-0006Zi-7G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:25:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54380 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsuMd-0003zu-Jx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56179) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsuM3-0003zh-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:24:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsuLy-0000Ct-Qn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:24:39 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39373) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsuLy-0000Cp-Na; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:24:34 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3771 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dsuLy-0003MN-3S; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:24:34 -0400 In-reply-to: <20170915164543.GA19268@holos.localdomain> (message from Mark Oteiza on Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:45:43 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218330 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:45:43 -0400 > From: Mark Oteiza > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > I think we should either leave the nil case alone -- it wasn't > > documented before in such detail -- or add more explanations and > > perhaps the reference. > > > > What's important is to describe the non-nil case. > > OK, I agree. How about the following? LGTM, thanks.