From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker (was: [RFE] Migration to gitlab)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 20:42:13 +0300
Message-ID: <83tvdy9rpm.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1552789070.5272.1@yandex.ru>
	<CAGK7Mr5M8Yb+-866S7QJ+ZgOUjJSWfwH8L2gXnfhmJiO=k6_Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<jwvtvg14kg6.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87imwhmmt8.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87y347g1l3.fsf@iotcl.com>
	<9ac21e82-8e47-f9b5-f88d-23c0c56946d1@yandex.ru>
	<87pnpc1lby.fsf@iotcl.com> <83zhoezdqc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87imuivfcr.fsf@iotcl.com> <83k1eyfxls.fsf@gnu.org>
	<17D21056-10B2-4813-AE90-9B2706936CE9@icloud.com>
	<83imuifqjc.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfzehrug.fsf@gmail.com>
	<83k1exec2n.fsf@gnu.org> <8736lkikqf.fsf@gmail.com>
	<83y33cb5nc.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7fsf91l.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87pnongeju.fsf@gnu.org> <jwvzhnqco1f.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="117198"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: toon@iotcl.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org, agrambot@gmail.com,
	tsdh@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 13 19:48:57 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hQF4I-000UMC-Us
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 19:48:55 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60975 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hQF4H-0004Tz-Mq
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 13:48:53 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46715)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1hQF3V-0004Qz-Ku
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 May 2019 13:48:06 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48711)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1hQEy8-0001Lz-Dx; Mon, 13 May 2019 13:42:32 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3151 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1hQEy7-0005rU-6G; Mon, 13 May 2019 13:42:31 -0400
In-reply-to: <jwvzhnqco1f.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Mon, 13 May 2019 12:41:25 -0400)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236469
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/236469>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  Alex Gramiak <agrambot@gmail.com>,  toon@iotcl.com,  dgutov@yandex.ru,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 12:41:25 -0400
> 
> > Why does Forge insist downloading the entire DB to the local machine?
> > That sounds like something that wouldn't scale well.
> 
> I don't know why it does so, but it sounds like a good idea to me, so
> you can later use them when you're offline.

If the DB is small enough, sure.  It sounds like somehow it isn't the
case with Forge and GitLab.