From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: icalendar.el bug fix patch Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 15:33:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83tv7nlo16.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875zkfd1rz.fsf@hm.sivalik.com> <83eeyslytn.fsf@gnu.org> <87imo3g8af.fsf@hm.sivalik.com> <831rurn3vs.fsf@gnu.org> <321C5595-5EBF-4231-9179-FE1CA4A412F7@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="7205"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rajeev@sivalik.com To: Mattias =?utf-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 01 14:33:44 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQX3e-0001gc-Qe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 14:33:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39314 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQX3d-0004Ew-CB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:33:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQX36-0003hA-V3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:33:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58444) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQX36-0005zF-M6; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3197 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iQX35-0000jj-Ew; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 09:33:08 -0400 In-reply-to: <321C5595-5EBF-4231-9179-FE1CA4A412F7@acm.org> (message from Mattias =?utf-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= on Fri, 1 Nov 2019 14:24:31 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241699 Archived-At: > From: Mattias EngdegÄrd > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 14:24:31 +0100 > Cc: Rajeev Narang , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > 1 nov. 2019 kl. 14.05 skrev Eli Zaretskii : > > > If we need to say [.\n], let's say that. IMO, it expresses its intent > > much more than the cryptic [^z-a]. > > '.' is not special inside []; you would have to write "\\(?:.\\|\n\\)" which is slower and messier, although perhaps easier to understand. Yes, it's easier to understand, so I prefer that we use it. > If readability is important, consider (rx (group (*? anychar))). What does it translate into?