From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs) Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 19:45:23 +0300 Message-ID: <83tv1ztd24.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83v9mkz5oo.fsf@gnu.org> <83pncsym6l.fsf@gnu.org> <4a9d6bb2-458d-89b0-5389-d1f883ef24a1@yandex.ru> <20200401135237.GA6240@ACM> <20200404110643.GB5329@ACM> <8a5e50ce-1ca6-078b-7e4b-b7849207092d@yandex.ru> <20200404123613.GE5329@ACM> <837dyvv1yq.fsf@gnu.org> <05ef31a9-a75e-4bbc-2c80-70d581baa0e9@yandex.ru> <83y2rbtddx.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="94824"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, akrl@sdf.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dgutov@yandex.ru, acm@muc.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 04 18:46:25 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jKlw8-000OZb-TM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 18:46:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40524 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKlw7-0002v8-Ur for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 12:46:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57051) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKlvL-0002NF-FP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 12:45:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKlvK-00027L-CW; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 12:45:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3887 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jKlvJ-0000ZV-Lv; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 12:45:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83y2rbtddx.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 04 Apr 2020 19:38:18 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246411 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 19:38:18 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: acm@muc.de, casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, akrl@sdf.org > > Is this with xdisp.c in a Git repository or outside of a Git > repository? Also, how many GC's and the time they took did benchmark report? With such short timings and running the test only once, the difference GC could make might be significant, so if different runs and different people here have different numbers of GC, we could be comparing apples with oranges.