From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: How to make Emacs popular again.
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 10:08:48 +0300
Message-ID: <83tuvdf6kf.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CANQHGB1052fKdSq0=F-PG8hLMC3WX-R3UaMmrHrntG8J3J2pVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87o8ls1vvq.fsf@posteo.net> <20200926145302.sjrwjrguf5ialc25@Ergus>
 <3201a9fe-de19-d553-0be1-d379f182fd47@yandex.ru>
 <E1kMMdG-0001SA-W2@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <84273aa2-24a9-7584-18b9-03a5ac783d62@yandex.ru>
 <E1kMk6w-0008Vc-Fr@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <caa3a750-eb75-7418-2e2d-a805889e18a5@yandex.ru>
 <CADs++6idFXfjZnpn-cYi=1PM8XEfF3DnYuyaXy-uEraK06xZqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <E1kNTrx-0004SS-1S@fencepost.gnu.org> <835z7vjrg3.fsf@gnu.org>
 <E1kNpy4-0004bS-JF@fencepost.gnu.org> <83tuvegkmo.fsf@gnu.org>
 <E1kNzqz-0005Yy-GZ@fencepost.gnu.org> <E1kOC7i-0003NI-PI@fencepost.gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="14972"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: spacibba@aol.com, eduardoochs@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net,
 emacs-devel@gnu.org, ams@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, jamtlu@gmail.com
To: rms@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 02 09:10:09 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kOFCj-0003nT-0A
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:10:09 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46490 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kOFCh-00007g-TO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 03:10:07 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52524)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1kOFBe-0007gs-KG
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 03:09:03 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41953)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kOFBe-0000jN-AC; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 03:09:02 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3232 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kOFBS-0001Lz-Td; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 03:08:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <E1kOC7i-0003NI-PI@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
 Stallman on Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:52:46 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:256930
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/256930>

> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Cc: eliz@gnu.org, philipk@posteo.net, eduardoochs@gmail.com,
> 	spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru,
> 	jamtlu@gmail.com
> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:52:46 -0400
> 
> I don't want to argue about whose fault it is.  The point is that
> the lookup software should handle a format that we can download
> Wikipedia in.

What's so special about wiktionary that we should prefer it?  The
other free and PD dictionaries used by dict.org aren't of lower
quality, and sometimes much better.