From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Any new method to deal with Emacs Fonts settings puzzles nearly
 every Chinese =?utf-8?Q?emacser=EF=BC=9F?=
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 22:03:21 +0200
Message-ID: <83tugfx1py.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <2c676019.21d2.17d19ba2dc8.Coremail.tumashu@163.com>
 <593d0379.21f8.17d19c624db.Coremail.tumashu@163.com>
 <7b6b298a.222b.17d19d2e110.Coremail.tumashu@163.com>
 <834k8gxe9v.fsf@gnu.org> <87fss0uixn.fsf@163.com>
 <831r3kxb05.fsf@gnu.org> <87v90vhmr8.fsf@163.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="3868"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: "Feng Shu" <tumashu@163.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 13 21:05:25 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mlzHB-0000l4-3T
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 21:05:25 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39280 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mlzHA-0005fJ-5i
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:05:24 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33048)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mlzFR-0004Mg-GJ
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:03:37 -0500
Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=59654 helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mlzFR-0007xo-7g; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:03:37 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:
 Date; bh=DNypETPSFblM+6OXDph2TESX0mSdbGXzu5eutn5R5tM=; b=Ehc5b2n91eMCrBKn/JEp
 PD8alh/B/MFvI8QIt8CjomcPxoF3wqppnPzECDqqTuBnQP2QvA+s5iOCAZh4vxsOPZq+pYfPRJlUR
 moIjzQL689iGyb/1nIqMm5T2zkLf2WwdJtrnyrzPrucA59piGJ/TnsvLANm5XXPyeqkEqiWEtOTP9
 3c3yQmwWRyEh/XhXXeF+/M05l7/G06OxRs02y6A6v/D6rrDBfMI9hyTzg8ydmx0bzk1QD0ZwxwvV5
 F8ArXbriKwEfPyO0Yv/vqRalJT1hp9xbrLAVbWT0vJfVZqJPJz16VKLRzmZKbTzFPVyhKGzeUIH92
 2p4+4OQvbJlPTg==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3267 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mlzFQ-0003nv-6U; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:03:37 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87v90vhmr8.fsf@163.com> (tumashu@163.com)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279347
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/279347>

> From: "Feng Shu" <tumashu@163.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 03:35:39 +0800
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > I'm actually surprised that there are no font pairs that already solve
> 
> font parirs?  do you mean Chinese fonts and Ascii fonts use different
> size? 

I mean a pair of fonts, one for ASCII, the other for Chinese, such
that the Chinese characters take exactly twice the width as ASCII
characters.  Aren't there such pairs of fonts?