From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any new method to deal with Emacs Fonts settings puzzles nearly every Chinese =?utf-8?Q?emacser=EF=BC=9F?= Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 22:03:21 +0200 Message-ID: <83tugfx1py.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2c676019.21d2.17d19ba2dc8.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <593d0379.21f8.17d19c624db.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <7b6b298a.222b.17d19d2e110.Coremail.tumashu@163.com> <834k8gxe9v.fsf@gnu.org> <87fss0uixn.fsf@163.com> <831r3kxb05.fsf@gnu.org> <87v90vhmr8.fsf@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3868"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Feng Shu" <tumashu@163.com> Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 13 21:05:25 2021 Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>) id 1mlzHB-0000l4-3T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 21:05:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39280 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>) id 1mlzHA-0005fJ-5i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:05:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33048) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mlzFR-0004Mg-GJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:03:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=59654 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mlzFR-0007xo-7g; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:03:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=DNypETPSFblM+6OXDph2TESX0mSdbGXzu5eutn5R5tM=; b=Ehc5b2n91eMCrBKn/JEp PD8alh/B/MFvI8QIt8CjomcPxoF3wqppnPzECDqqTuBnQP2QvA+s5iOCAZh4vxsOPZq+pYfPRJlUR moIjzQL689iGyb/1nIqMm5T2zkLf2WwdJtrnyrzPrucA59piGJ/TnsvLANm5XXPyeqkEqiWEtOTP9 3c3yQmwWRyEh/XhXXeF+/M05l7/G06OxRs02y6A6v/D6rrDBfMI9hyTzg8ydmx0bzk1QD0ZwxwvV5 F8ArXbriKwEfPyO0Yv/vqRalJT1hp9xbrLAVbWT0vJfVZqJPJz16VKLRzmZKbTzFPVyhKGzeUIH92 2p4+4OQvbJlPTg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3267 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mlzFQ-0003nv-6U; Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:03:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87v90vhmr8.fsf@163.com> (tumashu@163.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org> Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279347 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/279347> > From: "Feng Shu" <tumashu@163.com> > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 03:35:39 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes: > > > I'm actually surprised that there are no font pairs that already solve > > font parirs? do you mean Chinese fonts and Ascii fonts use different > size? I mean a pair of fonts, one for ASCII, the other for Chinese, such that the Chinese characters take exactly twice the width as ASCII characters. Aren't there such pairs of fonts?