From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 15:32:04 +0200 Message-ID: <83tug7rm0c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> <835ysoursn.fsf@gnu.org> <831r3cugcp.fsf@gnu.org> <83y25judps.fsf@gnu.org> <83tug7tjww.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1408"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 20 14:33:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1moQUo-0000AW-VW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 14:33:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35304 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1moQUn-0005a5-LL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 08:33:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1moQTL-0004Uz-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 08:32:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=47402 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1moQTJ-0006Vh-PO; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 08:32:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=itsT9/T2/pKYMoczrppYr93B9y1HF31oKFzZJJ8yFUI=; b=KokEfqm8PYbW uniZDRcsga69Agr5KZViP0y7h+A93M5DwEuv5K1nVoF3hBgSCrxGwsBH04Ku8ygZyfcpkjnk5w/sU zImRpGPtsCU5F8Z7pN4KsekkGCWvnUCRE10K+os60TkiQmkSlq5FbEJ+nH01l0x52s7pKfJUF3x1Q G7KWklLC7N046BcX6bwJ2ZqkZLgr9Cs9kOQVEieURDI4MPNC5Oug21BXRmXLSkdnw/JqBL+HVg0Xv guqxaBGPxCqsDF3Cx26KoFM2fVaKRc0pEAXNj0fXrtroschxOIbH3/8v5qVZjuGlSTz1tE56GPmTM inHnbv2HAUMLCUgVNdyNDA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2045 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1moQTI-0006CA-VW; Sat, 20 Nov 2021 08:32:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sat, 20 Nov 2021 08:11:06 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279806 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 08:11:06 -0500 > > >> Yes, we may have to declare that for functions that "emulate" the > >> redisplay internally, the resulting horizontal position info might not > >> always be quite right (might not reflect what you'll see on the glass) > >> for text tat uses the new alignment functionality :-( > > That will break quite a few features, I'm afraid. > > This will completely depend on the specifics of when/how the answer > isn't quite right, of course. AFAIU, it will never be right, as long as this kind of alignment is used on display.