From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:59:15 +0200 Message-ID: <83sk8mdecc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> <873a0p1dqt.fsf@telefonica.net> <87r5o9yr4y.fsf@telefonica.net> <87mxywzx2r.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ocjcejeo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83r5o8l3oo.fsf@gnu.org> <873a0nyqjx.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87sk8nx7ba.fsf@telefonica.net> <83y6iedi2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87tyt2ygyq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267275570 26731 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2010 12:59:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 27 13:59:21 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlMGN-0006Yh-1s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:59:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36448 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlMGM-0005ae-IH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:59:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NlMGH-0005Zs-N9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:59:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50025 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlMGG-0005ZG-U9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:59:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlMGE-0006bn-8R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:59:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:59016) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlMGD-0006bc-VZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:59:10 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KYI00F003UVHO00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:59:08 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.186.130]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KYI00AMS42J87B0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 14:59:08 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87tyt2ygyq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121431 Archived-At: > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Cc: =D3scar Fuentes , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 21:57:01 +0900 >=20 > $ bzr add subdir/foo > adding subdir > adding subdir/foo What if you "cd subdir; bzr add foo"? > I don't know what Bob did, but I think it was more inclusive > (presumably by Bazaar DWIM behavior) than adding a single file. Maybe. But, given that his .bzr.log only has a single "add" command for that single file, what else could be at work here? What about symlinks (assuming that `share' directory was/is a symlink) -- could that be the reason for an implicit "add"? (At this point, it is probably worth asking these questions on the bazaar list, though.)