From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next pretest, and branching plans Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:06:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83sk8411o8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4B8147A9.7030504@gmail.com> <87ljemdzxo.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4B83682D.5010804@gnu.org> <4B9B0211.9070308@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268507239 14843 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2010 19:07:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 20:07:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqWg5-00016C-7t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:07:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44159 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqWg4-0002wb-BD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NqWg0-0002uu-2Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:07:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48913 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqWfy-0002ss-Cf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqWfw-0002ug-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:07:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:53174) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqWfw-0002uJ-JW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KZ800500I4P5J00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:06:40 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.214.230]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KZ8000CVIF3FDD0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:06:40 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121915 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:30:28 -0500 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Would it make sense to create a 'make package-install' target that omits > > these things (if there is other stuff besides the shortcut, that is more > > intended for a real installation rather than packaging)? When I am packaging > > I don't want the shortcut created. > > To me at least, the name "package-install" would not be helpful. > Something like "install_files_only" would sound more meaningful (or > "install_for_packaging", or ...). I suggest "dist", like in the top-level Makefile.in. There's no need for this target without actually producing the binary zip file, so it should run the makedist.bat script as part of its job.