From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is the difference between the src/oo/ and src/oo-spd/ directories? Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 20:17:06 +0300 Message-ID: <83sk5io7vx.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274635074 7882 80.91.229.12 (23 May 2010 17:17:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 17:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 23 19:17:53 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGEoC-0001Cb-GV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 19:17:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49373 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGEoB-000512-Sr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 13:17:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53848 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGEo5-00050H-Fd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 13:17:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGEo4-0004EH-0l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 13:17:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:47914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGEo3-0004E9-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 13:17:43 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L2V00J00UN16W00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 20:17:06 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.45.48]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L2V00HM8UOGDL50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 23 May 2010 20:17:05 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125138 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 18:13:22 +0200 > > Why is emacs.exe sometimes placed in the first and sometimes in the second? It depends on whether you configure with or without --no-opt. > What is the reason for having both? To allow you to have both optimized and unoptimized builds of the same sources.