From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rename and clean unexec.c Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:31:44 +0300 Message-ID: <83sk2tvudb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83hbjjcxex.fsf@gnu.org> <83bp9rcp19.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281031036 17676 80.91.229.12 (5 Aug 2010 17:57:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 17:57:16 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 05 19:57:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh4go-0002au-UQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:57:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57772 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oh4Sp-0006Qf-6c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:42:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58052 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oh4N7-0003vj-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:36:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh4Mz-0003xy-LQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:36:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:47774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oh4Mz-0003xB-Dm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 13:36:41 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L6O00000WMD4W00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:31:39 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.102.143]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L6O00LPIWOQV6H0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:31:39 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <83bp9rcp19.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128313 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:46:58 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > From: Dan Nicolaescu > > Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:46:12 -0400 > > > > I can't do it all, I don't know enough about what msdos wants there. > > That part's on me. I have a question here: do we want to strip unexcoff.c from everything except what the MSDOS build needs? That would mean any platform that will need COFF support will have to look for the code in prior revnos. I don't mind, assuming others think it's the right thing. (Is it plausible that some future, e.g., mobile platform will use COFF?) And what to do with "#ifdef emacs" -- should I leave the !emacs branches or delete them?