From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fixing Windows and DOS command line argument quoting Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:50:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83sjt49a1q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4DB4D7DB.50101@gmail.com> <83y62yal3o.fsf@gnu.org> <4DB53599.8040703@gmail.com> <4DB537BB.1090205@gnu.org> <4DB53D57.9030606@gmail.com> <4DB5B5B7.3070801@gmail.com> <837hai9nir.fsf@gnu.org> <4DB6A20F.2050106@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303840255 17341 80.91.229.12 (26 Apr 2011 17:50:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 26 19:50:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEmPS-00057u-9i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:50:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58768 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEmPR-00069T-T1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:50:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEmPP-00069N-AT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:50:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEmPO-000244-Bo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:50:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:40739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEmPO-00023w-4R; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:50:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LK900G00SF4OY00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:50:22 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.59.73]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LK900GDLTJVHH90@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:50:21 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4DB6A20F.2050106@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138796 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 03:44:31 -0700 > From: Daniel Colascione > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org > > > What are the disadvantages of detecting quoted command lines and > > sending only those through the shell? > > Besides complexity, none. I've implemented this approach, making the > necessary changes to cmdproxy.c and subr.el, and updated the trunk. Thank you!