From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changing the default for `send-mail-function' Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:29:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83sjqvs0fn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pqm0moff.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E07A2BB.7090809@gmail.com> <4E07AA38.2000301@gmail.com> <4E07B75C.2020003@gmail.com> <83vcvsrnhw.fsf@gnu.org> <4E0870C8.3050206@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309199171 24624 80.91.229.12 (27 Jun 2011 18:26:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Christoph Scholtes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 27 20:26:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbGVa-0007pn-E0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:26:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43238 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbGVY-00039v-Qp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:26:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbEgV-00062k-LW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbEgU-0000DE-5J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:29:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:43010) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbEgT-0000Cy-Oe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LNG00800INHON00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:29:00 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.8.216]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LNG008J3J4BML30@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:29:00 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4E0870C8.3050206@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141083 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:00:08 -0600 > From: Christoph Scholtes > > To Eli's point: is it safe to assume that the buffer content will always > be pure ASCII? That's the buffer through which we communicate with the SMTP server, right? If so, AFAIK the whole protocol is pure ASCII.