From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows 64 port Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:58:03 +0200 Message-ID: <83sji5te78.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120219211800.0000558f@unknown> <834numv7js.fsf@gnu.org> <4F428780.8070902@cs.ucla.edu> <4F42B076.4030702@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329771683 11372 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2012 21:01:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fabrice.popineau@supelec.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ajmr@ilovetortilladepatatas.com To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 20 22:01:21 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RzaMI-0000gj-VT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:01:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48456 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzaMI-00009E-E7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:01:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzaMD-0008Tr-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:01:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzaLB-00022h-2L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:00:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:48946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RzaLA-00021w-Ka for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:00:08 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LZP00200KONEN00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:00:05 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.150.51]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LZP001HEMC28HQ0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 23:00:03 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4F42B076.4030702@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148684 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:43:34 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: Eli Zaretskii , AJMR , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Ideally any changes for Windows 64 would be only to the > Windows-specific part of the code, so that we don't need to worry > about its effect on GNU hosts. gmalloc.c and ralloc.c must be exceptions from this rule, for obvious reasons. (Though the 64-bit Windows build probably is, or will be, the only 64-bit platform to use these two.) I'd also take a very good look at all the EMACS_UINT uses, and a few `long's and `unsigned long's in regex.c.